Disclaimer: I’m writing this blog post in an attempt to present a tiered approach to learning a new subject. It's also to solidify my understanding of the topic of base64 encoding as well as to act as an aide-memoire. I’m not presenting this information as infallible fact.
Preamble: Personally, learning a new programming concept (or any complex topic for that matter) requires me to take a very particular approach if I want gain and maintain a comprehensive understanding of it, and I don’t see resources which represent and facilitate my learning process very much in evidence.
Learning for me involves moving from the general to the specific and for my sources of information to assume as little as possible while establishing context and purpose quickly. Producing this type of learning resource usually manifests in tiered levels of explanation. To my mind, Tier 1 is where the biggest shortage of good resource on a topic generally is. It should be what the opening paragraph of the Wikipedia topic strives to attain: a succinct and clear overview of the topic that someone immersed in the relevant field can read and feel more illuminated right away. Further tiers of explanation should elaborate on what previous tiers have established.
Let me try presenting the first couple of tiers for base64 encoding in the style I'm talking about.
What I assume: you have a programming background and that you’re looking to better understand base64 encoding.
Okay, Tier 1 explanations might be relevant if you’ve just heard someone say “base64 encode” in a meeting and you’re thinking “I should probably have some idea what on Earth they’re talking about”; you’re googling about for five minutes to see if you can shed some light on the topic.
Wikipedia’s Base64 opening salvo is: “Base64 is a [...] binary-to-text encoding scheme that represent[s] binary data in an ASCII string format”.
This isn’t particularly illuminating on its own but there are a couple of clues in there: it’s something do with binary data being represented as ASCII characters.
Warning: rather unhelpfully, it is possible to immediately jump down the rabbit hole with base64 encoding and you may be thinking, as I was, “hang on a minute, everything eventually boils down to binary data - including ASCII characters - so that seems like a bit of a nonsense”. Or perhaps you have come across an example whereby someone is showing you how they converted a sentence (one string of characters) into base64 encoded text (another string of characters) and are thinking “what could possibly be the value in that!?”. If you’ve done either (or both) of these things, please, for the moment, put those thoughts on ice – don’t worry, I’m with you comrade, I feel your pain.
A concrete example might help. Imagine I have an 10 x 10 pixel jpeg image (some binary data) and I want to represent it (for some ungodly reason) as ASCII characters. Up steps base64 encoding. In fact, here is a base64 encoded 10 x 10 jpeg:
Sceptical? If you copy that text and save it into a new text file (called, say, “encodedJpg.txt”) and then navigate to the folder the file is saved in from a Windows command prompt, you can run the following command certutil -decode encodedJpg.txt 10x10.jpg and you should see the jpg recreated.
You can turn the jpg back in to the text above by running the alternative certutil -encode "input" "output" command.
And that’s Tier 1. For the moment we’re not going to worry about the mechanics of the operation, it’s enough to know that base64 encoding changes binary data into text that looks like the above. Why you'd want to do such a thing and how it's achieved are Tier 2 explanations. N.B. the binary data doesn’t have to be a jpeg image, it could be anything: an executable, a zip file, a Word document, etc.
Next >> Understanding base64 Encoding #2